Haven’t put on my Amos glasses in a while. For that, I deeply apologize.
The media cannot wait, though, and it has been a seriously interesting start of the summer in terms of movies. Since The Watchmen this past March, I’ve spent a good portion of my money on a good grip of movies. I’m starting to see a pattern as I ease into this full-time grind, where movies coming out try to instill “Summer” feelings as opposed to “Spring” feelings. Example, The Hangover is a summer movie, while I Love You, Man is a spring movie. (Never mind, that’s crazy don’t listen to me.) But what I want to discuss is 3D movies since my highlights of this year was Coraline and Up. First of all, isn’t implementing simple perspective on the big screen enough for a sense of three dimensions, a.k.a depth? That would be fine in my book, cuz in the end, you are just watching a flat screen. Make a cube of moving hologram images and that will be a 3D “movie.” People would be sitting around it, and going to movies would be akin to going to a concert. Or I dunno, actually be in a movie. (That’s as 3D as it gets. Are you not entertained??!)
Soooo…I watched Up in both its 3D and un-3D incarnations. (I know, I know. I had to find out!) I think I can see now where 3D can be relevant. A movie like Up goes through a lot of different settings. It moves through decades, and if that wasn’t enough, the movie also brought you to South America. What Pixar wanted you to pay attention to was the environment. In 3D, I got the sense of what Mr. Frederikson wanted in the first place, utter peace. His house hovering over the a thick layer of clouds extending to all horizons was immersive. I really could live in that scene forever. And that was only one of the scenes that exhibited something that animated movies have so much potential in portraying: sheer scale. The number of balloons needed to lift a house off the grid, the size of a dirigible holding some of the rarest fossils on Earth, the difference of a small house among growing sprawl, and how small a house really looks when on top of a tall waterfall.
This movie really Jamba’d my juices. I’m pretty excited about what animated movies might look like in the future. One suggestion, the 3D glasses really do get in the way. When watching Up not in 3D, I appreciated the details I saw in my peripherals, while in 3D, you’re forced to shift from vantage point to vantage point because the 3D effect really just makes your eyes shift focus. You don’t really have time to appreciate the scenery. (On a design perspective, constantly changing focus might be tiring to viewers. Maybe 3D films of the future will have to settle with 1 hour or shorter films with less substance and more gimmicks.) 3D should be about scale, it’s so simple yet blows minds with a real 3rd dimension.


